Sometimes as a parent, I feel like I'm doing a pretty good job. And then there's the other 99% of the time. For example, a little before Christmas I came across this great idea for teaching children about charity and giving. This mom helps her children choose five toys that they no longer play with. They put these toys in a bag and leave it out on Christmas Eve for Santa to take to children who don't have any toys. Santa then leaves new toys. I thought Sam was old enough to understand the concept of giving, so one day I sat down with him and explained to him that there are poor boys and girls out there who don't have any toys at all to play with. "Wouldn't that be sad to not have any toys at all?" I asked. Sam agreed. I then explained that we have lots and lots of toys, some that we don't even play with anymore. I suggested that we choose a few toys that we don't play with anymore and leave them for Santa to take to those poor children who don't have anything. I also told him that I was sure Santa was going to be bringing him some new toys. Sam suddenly started to cry. At first, I thought he was crying out of compassion for the poor children who have nothing. My heart was saying, "Awwwww..." until Sam wailed out, "Don't give my toys away! Don't let the poor boys and girls get my toys!" It took me an hour to calm him down. That night he actually woke up in the middle of the night screaming, "Not the poor boys and girls!" Apparently my message was lost in translation.
The other day I had a hankering for brownies, and so I made some. When Nic got home from some church meetings, he asked for a brownie. I told him to help himself and to cover them up for me when he was done. As he was covering the brownies with some aluminum foil, Sam came into the kitchen and cried out, "No! Don't give them to the neighbors!" Nic about fell over laughing. Yet another lesson lost in translation.
1 hunky husband + 3 adorable and adventurous boys + 1 beautiful, little princess + 1 big, slobbery dog = 1 happy momma!
Let it be noted that I was once an English teacher but am now the mother of four very young and very vivacious children. I blame all grammatical and spelling errors on this fact and ask for your compassion and forgiveness (and maybe some brownies too). =)
Friday, February 22, 2013
Thursday, February 14, 2013
An excerpt from The Red Tape Letters
The Red Tape Letters
By Jolene Jenkins
“Love is of all passions the strongest, for it attacks
simultaneously the head, the heart, and the senses.”
--Lao Tzu
“Better to have lost and loved than never to have loved at
all.”
--Ernest Hemingway
“The heart wants what it wants. There’s no logic to these
things. You meet someone and you fall in love and that’s that.”
--Woody Allen
“All is fair in love and war.”
--Proverb
“Love is a battlefield.”
--Pat Benetar
To
C.S. Lewis
Preface
I HAVE no intention of explaining how these letters came
into my possession.
There are two equal and opposite errors into which our race
can fall concerning love. One is apathy or a lack of desire, passion, or
emotion about love. To go about in life with an indifference toward love
endangers a person to not fully experience life and all that it has to offer.
The other error is to believe, and to feel an excessive and unhealthy obsession
with love or an object or subject of love. They themselves are equally pleased
by both errors and hail puppy love or true love with the same delight. The sort
of script used in this book can be very easily obtained by anyone who has once
learned the knack; but disposed and excitable people or people who are prone to
use excessive amounts of glitter, exclamation points, or clichés who might make
a bad use of it shall not learn it from me.
Readers are advised to remember that a cupid is often
blinded by love. Not everything that Amore, affectionately known as Uncle Ray,
should be assumed to be true or right in every circumstance or for every
individual. I have made no attempt to identify any of the human beings
mentioned in these letters; but I think it very unlikely that the portraits,
say of the patient’s mother, are entirely accurate.
In conclusion, I ought to add that no effort has been made
to clear up the chronology of the letters. Not because of laziness on my part,
but in order to preserve the authenticity of the letters. When dealing with
love, time can be lengthy or short, depending on the phase of love, and
terrestrial time seems to have no bearing on a cupid. What was going on in the
world, except in so far as it happens now and then to impinge upon the
relationship status of one human being, was obviously of no interest to Uncle
Ray.
Jolene Jenkins
February 14, 2013
I
MY DEAR AMORINI,
I note what
you say about guiding our patient’s Internet browsing and taking care that he
doesn’t see a good deal of his happy bachelor friend. But are you not being a
trifle naïve? It sounds as if you supposed that argument was the way to
convince him to fall in love. That might have been so if he had lived a few
centuries earlier. At that time the human still knew pretty well what love was
and what it was not; and love was thought of in a favorable manner. They still
connected love with unselfishness, commitment, matrimony, and children. They
connected love with doing, with action, and were prepared to alter their way of
life in order to commit to their love. But what with the media, The Bachelor
reality show, Taylor Swift break-up songs, and other such weapons, society has
largely altered that. Your man has been accustomed, ever since he was a boy, to
have a dozen incompatible philosophies concerning love dancing about together
inside his head. He doesn’t think of love and commitment primarily as “good” or
“bad”, but as “idealized” or “sappy”, “outworn” or “too contemporary”, “conventional”
or “ruthless”. Jargon, not argument, is your best ally in helping him consider
love. Don’t waste time trying to make him think love will bring him happiness!
Make him think love is fun, or profitable, or popular—that it is the philosophy
of the future. That’s the sort of thing he cares about.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)